Yes, and the rule is stricter than the one for alcohol
Wisconsin does not have a “legal limit” for THC the way it has .08 for alcohol. It has 1 nanogram per milliliter of active delta-9-THC, close enough to zero that a single evening’s use can cross it. Under § 346.63(1)(am), a person may not drive or operate a motor vehicle with a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in his or her blood, and § 340.01(50m) puts delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on that list at a concentration of 1 ng/mL or more. The State does not need a bad driving pattern, a failed field sobriety test or any evidence of impairment. It needs a lawful stop, a lawful arrest, and a lab report.
That is why THC OWI cases in Racine and Kenosha counties are won and lost on three things: whether the stop and arrest were lawful, whether the blood was lawfully drawn and correctly analyzed, and what, exactly, the lab found.
- Detectable-amount charge: § 346.63(1)(am), a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance in the blood; for delta-9-THC the definition sets that at 1 ng/mL.
- Impairment charge: § 346.63(1)(a), operating while under the influence of an intoxicant, a controlled substance or any drug.
- What counts: § 340.01(50m), which lists delta-9-THC at 1 ng/mL or more and excludes its precursors and metabolites.
- Prescription defense: § 346.63(1)(d), a valid prescription for the substance.
- Penalties: § 346.65, identical tiers to alcohol OWI.
- Roadside screening, including oral fluid: § 343.303 as amended by 2025 Wisconsin Act 99.
- Post-arrest chemical test and refusal: § 343.305.
- Counting priors: § 343.307.
The metabolite rule: the detail that decides cases
THC leaves two footprints in blood. Active delta-9-THC is what the statute prohibits. Its inactive metabolite, 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC, stays detectable for days or weeks after the last use and is what most people mean when they say marijuana “stays in your system.” The Legislature excluded metabolites from the definition in § 340.01(50m), so a lab report showing only carboxy-THC does not prove the detectable-amount offense. The State’s fallback is the impairment charge under § 346.63(1)(a), and that charge requires proof you were actually under the influence, which a normal driving pattern and a clean field-sobriety video can defeat.
Active THC at a low level is a harder case, because the statute means what it says. Those cases turn on the stop and the blood draw.
Where the defense usually is
- The stop. A traffic stop must be supported by reasonable suspicion of a violation, and a stop that is extended to investigate drugs without new suspicion is unlawful under Rodriguez v. United States. See can police search my car in Wisconsin.
- The arrest. Odor alone, red eyes and an admission of use “yesterday” are a thinner probable-cause picture for a drug arrest than for alcohol, and the roadside swab under § 343.303 is a screening device, not proof.
- The blood draw. Blood is taken under the implied-consent law, § 343.305, or a warrant. Consent obtained with an inaccurate warning, a draw outside the statutory framework, or a chain-of-custody gap are each suppression issues.
- The lab. Which analyte was found, at what level, with what uncertainty, and whether the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene’s method and the analyst’s testimony hold up on cross-examination.
Penalties follow the alcohol tiers
A THC OWI is punished under § 346.65 exactly as an alcohol OWI with the same prior record: a first offense is a civil forfeiture with a 6- to 9-month revocation, a second within 10 years is a misdemeanor with mandatory jail, a fourth is a Class H felony, and every one counts as a prior for life from the third offense on. A first offense with a passenger under 16 is criminal from the start. Ignition-interlock requirements do not attach to a drug-only first offense the way they do to a high-alcohol one, but a revocation and an assessment do.
Wisconsin, Illinois and the border
Kenosha County’s I-94 corridor produces a steady volume of THC OWI arrests of Illinois residents who bought cannabis legally an hour south. Legal purchase in Illinois is not a defense in Wisconsin; possession of the product in the car is a separate charge under § 961.41(3g); and the Wisconsin conviction will be reported to Illinois for license purposes. Read the Kenosha court guide and, for the marijuana possession side, marijuana laws and charges.
The dedicated OWI site
This firm runs racineowi.com for OWI defense in Racine, Kenosha and Walworth counties, with offense-tier penalty tables, refusal-hearing deadlines, occupational-license timing and the 2026 ignition-interlock changes under Act 210. For a THC arrest, start there or call (262) 632-5000; the phone is answered 24 hours a day and the case review is free.