Reference Guide

Case Results, Racine & Kenosha Criminal Defense Outcomes

Anonymized Wisconsin criminal defense outcomes from Cafferty & Scheidegger. Dismissals, not-guilty verdicts, reduced charges, and keep-your-license results across Racine, Kenosha, and Walworth counties.

Representative Outcomes, Anonymized

These are representative matters from our practice. Names are withheld; facts are described to the minimum extent needed to illustrate the defense work. Every case is different, and past results do not guarantee future outcomes. But they do illustrate how we approach matters that others would plead.

Homicide and serious felony

Jury acquittal

First-degree intentional homicide

Cafferty tried a murder case in Racine County Circuit Court where the State relied on a contested confession and a single cooperating witness. Motion to suppress the confession was briefed and heard pre-trial; a portion of the statement was excluded. At trial, cross-examination of the cooperator revealed undisclosed sentencing consideration. Jury acquitted after approximately two days of deliberation.

Result: Not guilty · Racine County
Charge reduced

Drug-delivery first-degree reckless homicide, reduced to Class D

Overdose death case. The State initially charged § 940.02(2) drug-delivery first-degree reckless. Defense toxicology showed multiple substances in the decedent's system. Post-preliminary-hearing negotiation reduced the charge to § 940.06 second-degree reckless, dropping the exposure by half.

Exposure: Class B → Class D felony
Homicide dismissed

Homicide by intoxicated use of vehicle, § 940.09(2) defense prevailed

OWI-fatality case. Accident reconstruction demonstrated that the decedent crossed the center line. Defense engaged a reconstruction expert, developed the § 940.09(2) "would have occurred anyway" defense, and the case resolved with dismissal of the homicide count. A separate OWI with injury count was pled to a reduced felony with probation.

Result: Homicide count dismissed · probation on reduced felony

OWI and DUI

Reduced to 2nd

3rd-offense OWI → 2nd-offense misdemeanor

Kenosha County. Prior Illinois DUI conviction did not qualify under § 343.307 as a Wisconsin countable prior; we traced the Illinois statute and confirmed the element discrepancy. Third-offense charge reduced to second-offense misdemeanor.

Avoided: Mandatory 45-day jail sentence
Elevation withdrawn

1st-offense OWI with child passenger, § 346.65(2)(f) challenge

Racine County. The State sought the §(2)(f) elevation (passenger under 16). Defense argued the age-at-time-of-offense question was contested and the child's DOB could not be established by admissible evidence. Elevation was withdrawn; resolution was a standard first-offense civil forfeiture.

Result: Civil forfeiture, not criminal
Case dismissed

4th-offense OWI felony, probable-cause suppression

Walworth County. Pretextual stop for a lane-deviation issue. Dash-cam review showed the deviation was within statutory tolerance. Motion to suppress granted; BAC excluded; case dismissed.

Exposure: Class H felony · Dismissed
CDL preserved

CDL-OWI, federal disqualification avoided

Client held a HAZMAT CDL. First-offense OWI reduced to a non-qualifying wet-reckless alternative at plea. Three-year federal disqualification under 49 CFR § 383.51(b)(2) avoided; employment preserved.

Avoided: 3-year CDL disqualification

Drug charges

Evidence suppressed

Methamphetamine delivery, federal search warrant suppressed

Federal case, Eastern District of Wisconsin. Staleness and informant-basis challenges to the search warrant. Court granted suppression of the evidence obtained in execution; government dismissed the § 841 count.

Result: § 841 count dismissed
Life sentence avoided

Federal cocaine conspiracy, § 851 enhancer withdrawn

Client facing mandatory life with two prior drug-felony enhancers. Collateral-attack brief on one of the predicate convictions; government withdrew one of the § 851 notices. Sentencing exposure reduced from mandatory life to a substantially lower guidelines range.

Exposure: Mandatory life → guidelines range
Felony → misdemeanor

PWID marijuana (2.5 lbs), reduced to simple possession

Racine County. Weight-threshold challenge combined with a constructive-possession defense involving multi-occupant vehicle. State agreed to amendment to simple possession; no felony conviction.

Result: No felony on record

Weapons

Rehaif defense

Felon in possession § 922(g)(1)

Federal case. Defendant sincerely believed his rights had been restored after a state-level pardon. Successful Rehaif motion raised significant doubt on the knowledge-of-prohibited-status element. Case resolved with time-served plea to a lesser offense.

Result: Time-served plea to lesser offense
Acquittal

CCW under § 941.23, bench trial

Racine County. Defense argued the firearm was not concealed within the meaning of the statute given its partial visibility in the vehicle. Court agreed. Not guilty.

Result: Not guilty

Theft and property crime

Class C → Class F

Armed robbery, reduced to theft from person

Walworth County. Weapon was a pellet gun that had been misidentified as a firearm in the initial report; forensic examination confirmed. Armed element struck; reduced charge; probation-eligible disposition.

Exposure: Class C felony → Class F felony
Case dismissed

Retail theft ($1,200 value), failed preliminary hearing

Kenosha County. Store-loss-prevention video did not capture the alleged concealment. State failed to establish the knowingly-take element at preliminary hearing. Dismissed.

Result: Full dismissal

Traffic defense (also see racineticket.com)

Criminal → forfeiture

Reckless driving criminal charge, amended to civil forfeiture

Charge under § 346.62 amended to a § 346.89 inattentive-driving forfeiture. No criminal record; insurance impact minimized.

Result: No criminal record
CDL preserved

6-point speeding in CDL vehicle, disqualification avoided

Commercial vehicle, 20 mph over. Defense negotiated amendment to a non-serious-violation forfeiture. CDL unaffected.

Avoided: Federal CDL disqualification
License restored

Habitual traffic offender revocation, occupational license granted

Client revoked under § 351.02. Successful petition for a work-purposes occupational license; client retained employment.

Result: Employment preserved

About these numbers

Cafferty & Scheidegger has handled more than 50 homicide trials and hundreds of felony matters since 1994. Our aggregate Google review rating is 4.9 / 5 across 609 reviews. We are rated AV Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell, and Patrick Cafferty has been named a Wisconsin Super Lawyer for 18 consecutive years (2008 to 2026).

If you want to discuss whether an outcome like one of these is realistic in your case, call or text (262) 632-5000 or request a free, confidential consultation.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case presents different facts, law, and procedural posture. These summaries are illustrative only and should not be read as a promise of a particular result in any other matter.

Verified Google Reviews

What clients say on Google

4.9  across 636 Google reviews View on Google →

  • ★★★★★
    “I cannot say enough about how phenomenal my criminal defense attorney, Juan Ramirez, truly is. I was facing an extremely difficult and complex case - one that felt overwhelming and life-altering in every sense of the word. From the very beginning, Juan…”
  • ★★★★★
    “I highly recommend Juan Sebastian Ramirez, he is an outstanding attorney. He is extremely knowledgeable, experienced, and professional, and it truly shows in the way he handles every aspect of a case. He helped my family during a very difficult and stressful…”
  • ★★★★★
    “If your in a jam or bad spot did something stupid get the law office of Cafferty & Scheidegger. I put myself in a bad position drinking and driving/ firearm charges and hurt someone in an accident and it wasn’t my first time. Pat represented me and didn’t…”
  • ★★★★★
    “Pat Cafferty ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ – If you are one to look at reviews before choosing the right attorney, let this be your choice! His name speaks volumes across county's and courtrooms! With him by your side, you are in excellent hands supported by the best team! My…”
  • ★★★★★
    “Highly recommend Pat Cafferty! He is one of the most well know lawyers in the county and his name carries through court like he is force to be reckoned with. Will consulting he has such a way with speaking to make your most stressful times feel not so…”
  • ★★★★★
    “Pat Cafferty did an amazing job with my case. I would highly recommend him and his staff. i'm very thankful i came across his practice. Definitely top notch and will get the job done!”

Reviews sourced from our Google Business Profile listings. Names appear as reviewers posted them; full text is available on Google.